| |
|
Editor's Introduction |
 |
 |
What possibilities – and risks – do faith and science raise for one another? by Ryan P. Cumming On the surface, it would appear that the two conversations featured in this issue of JLE could not have less in common.Yet on a deeper level, both conversations share a central concern: what principles ought to shape our relationship to technology, inside and outside our churches? |
|
|
| |
|
Genetics, Ethics, and the Beginning of Life |
 |
|
Review Essay: Fritz Oehlschlaeger, Procreative Ethics: Philosophical and Christian Approaches to Questions at the Beginning of Life by Paul R. Hinlicky In this recent book, Oehlschlaeger shows how Christian ethics should be telling us about a fundamental, perhaps fatal, dilemma of our civilization: we seek to solve with money and power problems which in the final analysis are matters of love and justice. |
 |
 |
|
A Discussion of Procreative Ethics: Philosophical and Christian Approaches to Questions at the Beginning of Life by Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth As Christians, both authors (Oehlschlaeger and Hinlicky) echo the familiar refrain that we are called to be “servants of all,” particularly servants to those who depend upon us for life itself. This writer’s refrain is similar, however, she finds that the conversations concerning the moral questions surrounding the beginnings of human life must center upon a relational understanding of the self. |
 |

|
|
Guiding Genetic Intervention by James C. Peterson Oehlschlaeger is right that human genetic intervention warrants our best attention and discernment. We agree on that, but his counting on a distinction between therapy and enhancement is not as clear a line of demarcation as he hopes, and implemented would cause significant harm in multiple levels and ways. |
 |
 |
|
Responses to Comments on Procreative Ethics by Professors Dragseth, Peterson, and Hinlicky by Fritz Oehlschlaeger Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Lutheran Ethics for making possible such extensive consideration of my Procreative Ethics: Philosophical and Christian Approaches to Questions at the Beginning of Life. I owe particular debts of gratitude to my friend Paul Hinlicky for his generous and detailed engagement with the book and to Jennifer Hockenbery Dragseth and James C. Peterson for their contributions to the conversation. |
|
|
| |
|
The Virtual Church: Technology, Ecclesiology, and Ethics |

|
|
The Question Concerning Technology and Religion by A. K. M. Adam The question concerning technology and religion typically confronts us today when skeptics and enthusiasts debate the reality and validity of computers’ mediation of theological experience, when dubious observers denounce the deleterious effects of digital technology on spirituality, or advocates praise the benefits of online piety. ... Are computers making us dumber, more globally aware, less religious, more spiritual?
|
 |
 |
|
Narcissism Gone Wild or Religion 2.0? by Susan Barreto Adam’s initial question is a complicated one: “Are computers making us dumber, more globally aware, less religious, more spiritual?” In looking for an answer, he points to a long tradition of religion selectively embracing technology. His view is that ultimately believers will “bring to bear their sense of what is most important and most decisive in their faith.” Operating in the 21st Century, this might be easier said than done. |
 |
 |
|
The Question Concerning Metriopathic Technophilia by Clint Schnekloth Since almost all reflection on technology, and perhaps especially digital technology, seems to run to the extremes, A.K.M Adam's refreshing and important contribution to the genre is his metriopathic technophilia. His love of technology is "measured." |
 |
 |
|
Technology, Lutheranism, and the Proclamation by Eric Berg In this essay, I will argue that technology itself is neither good nor bad, it is neutral, and the moral responsibility lands on us and how we use it. For Lutherans, it is how we use technology in service of the neighbor, and in terms of Lutheran religious practices, it is how it is used in relation to the Proclamation. |
 |
 |
|
Technology as Tool and as World: Response to The Question Concerning Technology and Religion by Gregory Walter A. K. M. Adam’s essay urges caution; it also charges communities to carefully evaluate technology from the various teachings and orientations that arise from the adherent’s specific tradition and practices. His position encourages communities to evaluate technologies case-by-case. This moderation depends upon an idea that technologies are tools. Though this is largely the case, there are other ways of considering technology as a world that need to be considered in order to fully develop Adam’s orientation. |
|
|
| |
|
Book Reviews |
 |
|
Review Essay: Transformative Lutheran Theologies: Feminist, Womanist, and Mujerista Perspectives by Jane E. Strohl The dark reality of the situation of women, persons of color, and others pushed to the margins of society is laid out with compelling certainty. The authors offer this critique in bold strokes; they aim to expose such prejudice and ignorance to their readers and catch them up in a new vision. It is the second use of the law at work. |
 |
 |
|
Review Essay: Transformative Lutheran Theologies: Feminist, Womanist, and Mujerista Perspectives by Jacqueline Bussie Following Luther, who allowed experience—especially his Anfechtung moments of suffering, pain, and grief—to authentically shape his theology, the courageous women in this book transform traditional Lutheran patriarchal theology by likewise engaging it with the evangelical and prophetic power of their own lived experience. |
|
|
| |
|
A Seasonal Essay |
 |
|
The Advent Wisdom Project by Clint Schnekloth For the purposes of an essay in JLE, it is especially fortuitous that the first O Antiphon is on Wisdom, titled in classical music and traditional usage “O Sapientia.” So here we are, beginning another church year, launching into the season of Advent, and it made me wonder… what kind of wisdom passes for wisdom these days in Lutheran circles? So I took the time to survey a wide cross-section of my colleagues. |
 |