[1] The American law of self-defense, as a general rule,
requires that a defender who kills show that she reasonably feared
that she was in imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death.
This rule embodies two important understandings consonant with
Christian views of human nature and violence. One is implicit in
the requirement that the defender "reasonably" fear for her life
before she is justified in killing: the law recognizes how we
humans tend to see what we want to see - the self-centered and
self-justifying will can easily distort even the "facts" of a
situation, our sense of personal danger, the way we interpret
others around us as threats.
[2] Second, the law requires that the killer make a "reasonable
choice to kill," that is, that she have no alternative (such as
escaping or calling for help) because the threat is imminent, and
that killing is a proportional response to the threat which she
faces. The law of self-defense thus says, "you must choose life" if
you possibly can do so without risking death or serious injury.
[3] This law of self-defense does not always work flawlessly, as
Americans are discovering after the tragedy of September 11. The
government has called for a war against terrorism, effectively
arguing that the U.S. is acting in self-defense, rather than trying
to bring killers to justice as a law enforcement agency would first
attempt. Like the law of war, designed to govern nation-states
which send visible armies into battle over a particular piece of
earth, the limitations of the law of self-defense do not always
seem appropriate or to achieve justice, as in stalking or battering
cases, where the victim never knows where or when she will be
harmed, but lives constantly in fear. Many Americans want to say
that, like battered women who kill their abusive husbands in their
sleep, we need to go to war now, even though we cannot identify any
immediate physical danger, because we sense that the terrorists
will escalate to even greater crimes, and that no alternative short
of killing will stop them. Like battered women, these Americans are
not necessarily wrong to be apprehensive: in fact, many batterers
do kill, and wives' apprehensions of death often are correct.
[4] Yet, the conditions that the law of self-defense identifies
are important for Christians to consider as they go about their
daily lives after September 11. First, we can be sure that, because
we are creatures of the will, our sense of danger will be
distorted: we will see, in another's skin, or his different dress,
or his accent, a danger that does not exist. We will imagine
terrorists as larger than life, able to find us in ballparks and
tall buildings and airplanes no matter where we are, rather than
just as human beings who murder for the same complicated and
inexplicable reasons as those whose mug shots are shown on the
local news. We will be convinced that if the right security
precautions are put into place and we avoid the right activities,
we will be able to protect ourselves against the risk of death. Or
we will believe that if we employ violence immediately and
forcefully, throwing tons of weaponry against a few hundred
terrorists rather than waiting for peaceful alternative, we will be
safe - if for no reason than everyone will once again be afraid
that we are larger than life, and believe that we are
untouchable.
[5] The real danger is not only that in our fearful attempts to
secure ourselves against the innocent other, we will harm him for
no good reason - not just by making him fearful, but by refusing
him the respect due him as made in the image of God. Just as
importantly, we will do harm to the truth. The Christian call for
force (at best) as a last resort and, in Lutheran tradition, only
to protect others, is no pie-in-the-sky idealism. It is the means
for forcing us to give up our illusion and face the ironic reality
of life in this world: that overcaution and violence share the same
mistake: the more we try to trust in ourselves and our own clever
devices for our security, refusing to name and to trust the real
ground of our existence, the more terrorists we will see.